U.S. v. ORTIZ, 2:09CR20067 (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20120605755
Visitors: 20
Filed: Jun. 04, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 04, 2012
Summary: ORDER ROBERT T. DAWSON, District Judge. Now on this 4th day of June 2012, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed herein on May 9, 2012, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (Doc. 27). The parties did not file any written objections to the report and recommendation. The court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The report and recommendation is pro
Summary: ORDER ROBERT T. DAWSON, District Judge. Now on this 4th day of June 2012, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed herein on May 9, 2012, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (Doc. 27). The parties did not file any written objections to the report and recommendation. The court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The report and recommendation is prop..
More
ORDER
ROBERT T. DAWSON, District Judge.
Now on this 4th day of June 2012, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed herein on May 9, 2012, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (Doc. 27). The parties did not file any written objections to the report and recommendation.
The court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The report and recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, the 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion (Doc. 23) is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
