GODOUA v. ASTRUE, 12-2074. (2013)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20130627980
Visitors: 42
Filed: Jun. 26, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2013
Summary: ORDER P.K. HOLMES, III, Chief District Judge. The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations (Doc. #12) from United States Magistrate Judge Erin L. Setser. The Court has conducted a careful review of the findings and recommendations and of the timely objections filed by Plaintiff. After reviewing the record de novo as to Plaintiff's objections, the Court finds the Magistrate's reasoning to be sound and further finds that Plaintiff's objections offer neither law nor fact requir
Summary: ORDER P.K. HOLMES, III, Chief District Judge. The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations (Doc. #12) from United States Magistrate Judge Erin L. Setser. The Court has conducted a careful review of the findings and recommendations and of the timely objections filed by Plaintiff. After reviewing the record de novo as to Plaintiff's objections, the Court finds the Magistrate's reasoning to be sound and further finds that Plaintiff's objections offer neither law nor fact requiri..
More
ORDER
P.K. HOLMES, III, Chief District Judge.
The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations (Doc. #12) from United States Magistrate Judge Erin L. Setser. The Court has conducted a careful review of the findings and recommendations and of the timely objections filed by Plaintiff. After reviewing the record de novo as to Plaintiff's objections, the Court finds the Magistrate's reasoning to be sound and further finds that Plaintiff's objections offer neither law nor fact requiring departure from the Magistrates' findings.
The Court therefore concludes that the findings and recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted as this Court's findings in all respects in their entirety. Judgment will be entered accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
