Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

TOLLESON v. COLVIN, 12-3135. (2013)

Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20130829671 Visitors: 21
Filed: Aug. 28, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 28, 2013
Summary: ORDER P.K. HOLMES, III, Chief District Judge. The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations (Doc. 25) from Chief United States Magistrate Judge James R. Marschewski. There have been no objections. After careful review, the Court concludes that the findings and recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted as this Court's findings in all respects in their entirety. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees (Doc. 21) be GRANTED and
More

ORDER

P.K. HOLMES, III, Chief District Judge.

The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations (Doc. 25) from Chief United States Magistrate Judge James R. Marschewski. There have been no objections. After careful review, the Court concludes that the findings and recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted as this Court's findings in all respects in their entirety.

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees (Doc. 21) be GRANTED and finds that Plaintiff is entitled to an award under the EAJA in the total amount of $4,688.25. This amount should be paid in addition to, and not out of, any past due benefits which Plaintiff may be awarded in the future. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2528 (2010), the EAJA award should be made payable to Plaintiff, but may be mailed to Plaintiff's counsel.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer