LAWSON v. CITY OF CAMDEN, 12-CV-1092. (2013)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20130911627
Visitors: 5
Filed: Sep. 10, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 10, 2013
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY, District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice David Norwood. (ECF No. 38). Plaintiff moves to dismiss from this case Separate Defendant David Norwood in his individual capacity and official capacity. Upon consideration, the Court finds that the motion should be and hereby is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims against Separate Defendant David Norwood in his individual capacity and official capacity are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY, District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice David Norwood. (ECF No. 38). Plaintiff moves to dismiss from this case Separate Defendant David Norwood in his individual capacity and official capacity. Upon consideration, the Court finds that the motion should be and hereby is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims against Separate Defendant David Norwood in his individual capacity and official capacity are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. ..
More
ORDER
SUSAN O. HICKEY, District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice David Norwood. (ECF No. 38). Plaintiff moves to dismiss from this case Separate Defendant David Norwood in his individual capacity and official capacity. Upon consideration, the Court finds that the motion should be and hereby is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims against Separate Defendant David Norwood in his individual capacity and official capacity are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Because Separate Defendant David Norwood is dismissed from this case, the Court finds that Norwood's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 28) should be and hereby is DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
