Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

HOLT v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, 4:14-cv-4030. (2014)

Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20140318710 Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 17, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 17, 2014
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY, District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Stay. (ECF No. 18). Specifically, Plaintiff moves the Court to enter an order staying this litigation and extending the deadline to respond to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 14) until the Court rules on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. Upon consideration, the Court finds that good cause for an extension has been shown. Accordingly, the Court finds that Plaintiff's motion should be and her
More

ORDER

SUSAN O. HICKEY, District Judge.

Before the Court is Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Stay. (ECF No. 18). Specifically, Plaintiff moves the Court to enter an order staying this litigation and extending the deadline to respond to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 14) until the Court rules on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. Upon consideration, the Court finds that good cause for an extension has been shown. Accordingly, the Court finds that Plaintiff's motion should be and hereby is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The case is not stayed. However, the Court extends the deadline for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. If the Court denies Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, Plaintiff must respond to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment within fourteen (14) days of the entry of the order denying remand.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer