ROBINSON v. OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORP., 02-2282. (2014)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20140325601
Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 26, 2014
Latest Update: Feb. 26, 2014
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE JAMES R. MARSCHEWSKI, Chief Magistrate Judge. On February 5, 2014, a notice of appeal (Doc. 46) was filed by George C. Robinson, et al. Plaintiff George C. Robinson has now filed a motion to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP)(Doc. 55). The motion has been referred to me. Upon review of the application, I note that Plaintiff has a substantial number of assets although it appears many are encumbered by loans. However, he indicates he has two home
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE JAMES R. MARSCHEWSKI, Chief Magistrate Judge. On February 5, 2014, a notice of appeal (Doc. 46) was filed by George C. Robinson, et al. Plaintiff George C. Robinson has now filed a motion to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP)(Doc. 55). The motion has been referred to me. Upon review of the application, I note that Plaintiff has a substantial number of assets although it appears many are encumbered by loans. However, he indicates he has two homes..
More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
JAMES R. MARSCHEWSKI, Chief Magistrate Judge.
On February 5, 2014, a notice of appeal (Doc. 46) was filed by George C. Robinson, et al. Plaintiff George C. Robinson has now filed a motion to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP)(Doc. 55). The motion has been referred to me.
Upon review of the application, I note that Plaintiff has a substantial number of assets although it appears many are encumbered by loans. However, he indicates he has two homes, four cars, and art work the value of which he states is unknown. Further, he has a substantial monthly net income of $6,355. When all his monthly payments and expenses are subtracted, he still has a monthly disposable income of $1098.
For this reason, I recommend that the motion to proceed IFP (Doc. 55) be denied and Plaintiff directed to pay the appellate filing fee of $505.
The parties have fourteen (14) days from receipt of the report and recommendation in which to file written objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The failure to file timely objections may result in waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact. The parties are reminded that objections must be both timely and specific to trigger de novo review by the district court.
Source: Leagle
