SCHLENKER v. SELLS, 13-6018. (2014)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20140428936
Visitors: 15
Filed: Apr. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 25, 2014
Summary: ORDER ROBERT T. DAWSON, District Judge. Now before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion to Alter or Amend (doc. 41). Plaintiffs ask the Court to reconsider its order of April 14, 2014 (doc. 40) dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint for lack of complete diversity of citizenship between Plaintiffs and Defendants. As the Court stated in its previous order, Plaintiffs failed to establish diversity jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence in their response to Defendants' jurisdictional challenge. Acc
Summary: ORDER ROBERT T. DAWSON, District Judge. Now before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion to Alter or Amend (doc. 41). Plaintiffs ask the Court to reconsider its order of April 14, 2014 (doc. 40) dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint for lack of complete diversity of citizenship between Plaintiffs and Defendants. As the Court stated in its previous order, Plaintiffs failed to establish diversity jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence in their response to Defendants' jurisdictional challenge. Acco..
More
ORDER
ROBERT T. DAWSON, District Judge.
Now before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion to Alter or Amend (doc. 41). Plaintiffs ask the Court to reconsider its order of April 14, 2014 (doc. 40) dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint for lack of complete diversity of citizenship between Plaintiffs and Defendants. As the Court stated in its previous order, Plaintiffs failed to establish diversity jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence in their response to Defendants' jurisdictional challenge. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' Motion to Alter or Amend (doc. 41) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
