PROMED AMBULANCE, INC. v. CITY OF MALVERN, 14-6072. (2014)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20140801782
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jul. 31, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 31, 2014
Summary: ORDER ROBERT T. DAWSON, District Judge. On this 31st day of July 2014, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed in this case on July 11, 2014, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. (Doc. 22). No objections were filed to the report and recommendation. The court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The report and recommendation is proper and should be and hereby i
Summary: ORDER ROBERT T. DAWSON, District Judge. On this 31st day of July 2014, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed in this case on July 11, 2014, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. (Doc. 22). No objections were filed to the report and recommendation. The court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The report and recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is..
More
ORDER
ROBERT T. DAWSON, District Judge.
On this 31st day of July 2014, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed in this case on July 11, 2014, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. (Doc. 22). No objections were filed to the report and recommendation.
The court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The report and recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (doc. 11) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff's state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). Finally, Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (doc. 2) is DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
