ASHWORTH v. BRADLEY, 5:13-5132. (2014)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20140822784
Visitors: 11
Filed: Aug. 21, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 21, 2014
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY L. BROOKS, District Judge. Comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 26) filed in this case on July 31, 2014, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, Chief United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. Fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties. The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOP
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY L. BROOKS, District Judge. Comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 26) filed in this case on July 31, 2014, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, Chief United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. Fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties. The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPT..
More
ORDER
TIMOTHY L. BROOKS, District Judge.
Comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 26) filed in this case on July 31, 2014, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, Chief United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. Fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties.
The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff's Motion to Amend (Doc. 23) is GRANTED and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 13) is DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
