CHERRY v. SOUTHERN REFRIGERATED TRANSPORT, 4:13-cv-04095. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20150204b97
Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 03, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 03, 2015
Summary: ORDER BARRY A. BRYANT, Magistrate Judge. BEFORE the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider. ECF No. 45. Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and (3) (2005), United States District Judge Susan O. Hickey referred the Motion to the undersigned for decision. This matter is ready for decision. 1. Background : On October 15, 2013, Plaintiff filed a pro se Complaint against Defendant alleging discrimination based on race and color. ECF No. 1. On January 27, 2015, this Court se
Summary: ORDER BARRY A. BRYANT, Magistrate Judge. BEFORE the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider. ECF No. 45. Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and (3) (2005), United States District Judge Susan O. Hickey referred the Motion to the undersigned for decision. This matter is ready for decision. 1. Background : On October 15, 2013, Plaintiff filed a pro se Complaint against Defendant alleging discrimination based on race and color. ECF No. 1. On January 27, 2015, this Court set..
More
ORDER
BARRY A. BRYANT, Magistrate Judge.
BEFORE the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider. ECF No. 45. Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and (3) (2005), United States District Judge Susan O. Hickey referred the Motion to the undersigned for decision. This matter is ready for decision.
1. Background:
On October 15, 2013, Plaintiff filed a pro se Complaint against Defendant alleging discrimination based on race and color. ECF No. 1. On January 27, 2015, this Court set a hearing on Defendant's Motion for Sanctions. ECF No. 43. With this current Motion, Plaintiff asks the Court to reconsider the setting of a hearing on Defendant's Motion for Sanctions. ECF No. 45.
2. Discussion:
Plaintiff offers no valid basis for not having a hearing on Defendant's Motion for Sanctions. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider (ECF No. 45) is DENIED. This matter remains set for a hearing on the Motion for Sanctions on February 11, 2015 at 10:00 a.m.
Source: Leagle
