U.S. v. VELASQUEZ, 5:11-CR-50075 (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20150206947
Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 05, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 05, 2015
Summary: ORDER P.K. HOLMES, III, Chief District Judge. The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations (Doc. 81) from Chief United States Magistrate Judge James R. Marschewski. Also before the Court are Defendant's objections (Doc. 82). The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds that Defendant's objections offer neither law nor fact requiring departure from the Report and Recommendation. The Court finds that the Report and Recommendation is proper a
Summary: ORDER P.K. HOLMES, III, Chief District Judge. The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations (Doc. 81) from Chief United States Magistrate Judge James R. Marschewski. Also before the Court are Defendant's objections (Doc. 82). The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds that Defendant's objections offer neither law nor fact requiring departure from the Report and Recommendation. The Court finds that the Report and Recommendation is proper an..
More
ORDER
P.K. HOLMES, III, Chief District Judge.
The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations (Doc. 81) from Chief United States Magistrate Judge James R. Marschewski. Also before the Court are Defendant's objections (Doc. 82).
The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds that Defendant's objections offer neither law nor fact requiring departure from the Report and Recommendation.
The Court finds that the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly, for the reasons stated herein and in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations, Defendant's motion to vacate (Doc. 72) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
