BARNES v. NAPHIER, 12-2116. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20150508999
Visitors: 5
Filed: May 07, 2015
Latest Update: May 07, 2015
Summary: ORDER ROBERT T. DAWSON , District Judge . Now on this 7th day of May, 2015, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation (Doc. 42) filed by the Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, in regard to a motion for dismissal of complaint to allow for refiling (Doc. 41) filed by Plaintiff. Also before the Court are Plaintiff's objections (Doc. 43). The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, fi
Summary: ORDER ROBERT T. DAWSON , District Judge . Now on this 7th day of May, 2015, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation (Doc. 42) filed by the Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, in regard to a motion for dismissal of complaint to allow for refiling (Doc. 41) filed by Plaintiff. Also before the Court are Plaintiff's objections (Doc. 43). The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, fin..
More
ORDER
ROBERT T. DAWSON, District Judge.
Now on this 7th day of May, 2015, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation (Doc. 42) filed by the Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, in regard to a motion for dismissal of complaint to allow for refiling (Doc. 41) filed by Plaintiff. Also before the Court are Plaintiff's objections (Doc. 43).
The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The report and recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff's post-appeal motion is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
