HAYES v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, 4:15-cv-04010. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20150624900
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jun. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 23, 2015
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY , District Judge . Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed June 4, 2015 by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 28). Judge Bryant recommends that all claims against Defendant State Farm be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C.
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY , District Judge . Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed June 4, 2015 by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 28). Judge Bryant recommends that all claims against Defendant State Farm be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. 6..
More
ORDER
SUSAN O. HICKEY, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed June 4, 2015 by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 28). Judge Bryant recommends that all claims against Defendant State Farm be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in toto. Accordingly, all of Plaintiff's claims against Defendant State Farm are DISMISSED. Because the Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiff's case, all pending motions, including Defendant State Farm's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 15), Plaintiff's Motion for Enforcement of Defendant Settle Offer/Agreement (ECF No. 20), and Plaintiff's Motion for Removal to Lower Court (ECF No. 24) are hereby DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
