JOHNSON v. HELDER, 5:14-CV-5324. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20150910887
Visitors: 9
Filed: Sep. 09, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 09, 2015
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY L. BROOKS , District Judge . Comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 26) filed in this case on July 27, 2015, by the Honorable Erin L. Setser, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. The parties were advised that objections to the Report and Recommendation were due no later than August 13, 2015. On August 19, 2015, the Court was informed that Plaintiff Daniel Johnson had changed his address. The Clerk of Court then resent th
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY L. BROOKS , District Judge . Comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 26) filed in this case on July 27, 2015, by the Honorable Erin L. Setser, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. The parties were advised that objections to the Report and Recommendation were due no later than August 13, 2015. On August 19, 2015, the Court was informed that Plaintiff Daniel Johnson had changed his address. The Clerk of Court then resent the..
More
ORDER
TIMOTHY L. BROOKS, District Judge.
Comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 26) filed in this case on July 27, 2015, by the Honorable Erin L. Setser, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. The parties were advised that objections to the Report and Recommendation were due no later than August 13, 2015. On August 19, 2015, the Court was informed that Plaintiff Daniel Johnson had changed his address. The Clerk of Court then resent the Report and Recommendation to Plaintiff's new address and imposed a new deadline to file objections of September 8, 2015. That new deadline has now passed, and no objections were filed by either party.
The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to obey court orders and for failure to prosecute. All other pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
