Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

JONES v. COLVIN, 2:14-cv-2088. (2015)

Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20150911635 Visitors: 10
Filed: Sep. 10, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 10, 2015
Summary: ORDER P. K. HOLMES, III , Chief District Judge . The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations (Doc. 18) from United States Magistrate Judge Mark E. Ford. There have been no objections. After careful review, the Court concludes that the findings and recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted as this Court's findings in all respects in their entirety. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees (Doc. 15) be GRANTED and finds th
More

ORDER

The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations (Doc. 18) from United States Magistrate Judge Mark E. Ford. There have been no objections. After careful review, the Court concludes that the findings and recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted as this Court's findings in all respects in their entirety.

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees (Doc. 15) be GRANTED and finds that Plaintiff is entitled to an award under the EAJA in the total amount of $5,127.05. This amount should be paid in addition to, and not out of, any past due benefits which Plaintiff may be awarded in the future. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2528 (2010), the EAJA award should be made payable to Plaintiff, but may be mailed to Plaintiff's counsel.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer