BARBEE v. MURPHY, 14-6082. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20150918793
Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 16, 2015
Summary: ORDER ROBERT T. DAWSON , District Judge . On this 16th day of September 2015, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed in this case on June 25, 2015, by the Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. (Doc. 30). Also before the Court are Separate Defendant Wendy Kelley's objections (doc. 31) and Plaintiff's Response thereto (doc. 35). The court has reviewed this case de novo and, being well and sufficiently advised, f
Summary: ORDER ROBERT T. DAWSON , District Judge . On this 16th day of September 2015, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed in this case on June 25, 2015, by the Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. (Doc. 30). Also before the Court are Separate Defendant Wendy Kelley's objections (doc. 31) and Plaintiff's Response thereto (doc. 35). The court has reviewed this case de novo and, being well and sufficiently advised, fi..
More
ORDER
ROBERT T. DAWSON, District Judge.
On this 16th day of September 2015, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed in this case on June 25, 2015, by the Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. (Doc. 30). Also before the Court are Separate Defendant Wendy Kelley's objections (doc. 31) and Plaintiff's Response thereto (doc. 35).
The court has reviewed this case de novo and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The report and recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Separate Defendant Kelley's Motion to Dismiss (doc. 11) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion (doc. 11) is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's claims against Kelley in her official capacity, and those claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The motion (doc. 11) is DENIED as to Plaintiff's individual capacity medical care claim.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
