TATUM v. FLOSS, 6:14-CV-6002. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20151116932
Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 13, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 13, 2015
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY , District Judge . Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed October 15, 2015, by the Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 38. Judge Ford recommends that Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed on the grounds that Plaintiff has failed to prosecute this action, has failed to comply with the Court's order, and has failed to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules. See Fed
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY , District Judge . Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed October 15, 2015, by the Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 38. Judge Ford recommends that Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed on the grounds that Plaintiff has failed to prosecute this action, has failed to comply with the Court's order, and has failed to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules. See Fed...
More
ORDER
SUSAN O. HICKEY, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed October 15, 2015, by the Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 38. Judge Ford recommends that Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed on the grounds that Plaintiff has failed to prosecute this action, has failed to comply with the Court's order, and has failed to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). No party has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Upon review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in toto. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
