Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

MUHOMMAD v. HEMPSTEAD COUNTY, 4:14-CV-4032. (2016)

Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20160115n40 Visitors: 25
Filed: Jan. 15, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 15, 2016
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY , District Judge . Before the Court is a Motion to Reconsider filed by Plaintiff. ECF No. 45. On November 16, 2015, an order was entered denying Plaintiff's Motion for the Issuance of Subpoenas. ECF No. 40. Plaintiff now asks the Court to reconsider the order regarding the issuance of subpoenas for copies of DVDs containing magnetic resonance imaging done on his leg in 2011 and 2013. Judge Bryant denied Plaintiff's request for the issuance of subpoenas because "[t]he
More

ORDER

Before the Court is a Motion to Reconsider filed by Plaintiff. ECF No. 45. On November 16, 2015, an order was entered denying Plaintiff's Motion for the Issuance of Subpoenas. ECF No. 40. Plaintiff now asks the Court to reconsider the order regarding the issuance of subpoenas for copies of DVDs containing magnetic resonance imaging done on his leg in 2011 and 2013. Judge Bryant denied Plaintiff's request for the issuance of subpoenas because "[t]he medical records already supplied to the Plaintiff should contain the findings from the magnetic resonance imaging." ECF No. 40. Plaintiff has not indicated to the Court that the medical records do not contain these findings from the magnetic resonance imaging. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer