Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SULLIVAN v. U.S. BANK, N.A., 1:15-cv-01007. (2016)

Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20160502961 Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 26, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 26, 2016
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE BARRY A. BRYANT , Magistrate Judge . Before this Court is Defendant's Motion For Summary Judgment. ECF No. 19. Plaintiff filed a response to this motion. ECF No. 26. Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and (3) (2005), the Honorable Susan O. Hickey referred this motion to this Court for the purpose of making a report and recommendation. On April 25, 2016 the parties appeared for a hearing on Defendant's Motion
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Before this Court is Defendant's Motion For Summary Judgment. ECF No. 19. Plaintiff filed a response to this motion. ECF No. 26. Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and (3) (2005), the Honorable Susan O. Hickey referred this motion to this Court for the purpose of making a report and recommendation.

On April 25, 2016 the parties appeared for a hearing on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment ECF No. 28. Prior to hearing, the parties announced they had resolved this matter and had prepared an Agreed Order of Dismissal. The Agreed Order of Dismissal provides for this matter to be dismissed without prejudice. A copy of the proposed Agreed Order of Dismissal is attached hereto. The original Agreed Order of Dismissal is being forward to Judge Hickey for review.

The parties also agreed that the pending Motion For Summary Judgment (ECF No. 19) should be denied as moot. Finally, the parties agreed to waive the fourteen (14) day time period in which to file objections to this Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, I recommend that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 19) be DENIED AS MOOT.

FURTHER, I recommend this matter be dismissed upon the filing of the proposed Agreed Order of Dismissal.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Upon joint request of the parties, the Court hereby finds and orders as follows:

1. Defendant U.S. Bank, N.A. ("U.S. Bank"), sent loan modification forms by mail to Plaintiffs Jimmy Sullivan and Charlotte Sullivan (the "Sullivans") on January 15, 2016. The Sullivans are still seeking a loan modification and will submit all necessary documentation to U.S. Bank by July 15, 2016.

2. The facts contained in the Requests for Admission filed by U.S. Bank on January 15, 2016, are admitted to by the Sullivans.

3. This action and all claims made herein are hereby dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________ HONORABLE SUSAN O. HICKEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE WILSON AND ASSOCIATES, P.L.L.C. One East Center, Suite 310 Fayetteville, AR 72701, (479) 521-5820 By: ______________________________________ H. Keith Morrison (84210) Attorneys for Defendant U.S. Bank, N.A. Consented to by: ____ JIMMY SULLIVAN _____________________ Jimmy Sullivan and ____ CHARLOTTE SULLIVAN ________________________ Charlotte Sullivan
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer