Hatos v. Colvin, 4:15-cv-04071. (2016)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20160519923
Visitors: 6
Filed: May 18, 2016
Latest Update: May 18, 2016
Summary: JUDGMENT SUSAN O. HICKEY , District Judge . Now on this 18th day of May 2016, comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation dated April 26, 2016, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 15. Fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties. The Court has reviewed this case, and being well and sufficiently advised, finds that the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be adop
Summary: JUDGMENT SUSAN O. HICKEY , District Judge . Now on this 18th day of May 2016, comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation dated April 26, 2016, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 15. Fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties. The Court has reviewed this case, and being well and sufficiently advised, finds that the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be adopt..
More
JUDGMENT
SUSAN O. HICKEY, District Judge.
Now on this 18th day of May 2016, comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation dated April 26, 2016, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 15. Fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties. The Court has reviewed this case, and being well and sufficiently advised, finds that the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation; grants Defendant's Motion to Remand (ECF No. 15); reverses the decision of the Commissioner, and remands this case to the Commissioner for further consideration pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2006).
If Plaintiff wishes to request an award of attorney's fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) 28 U.S.C. § 2412, an application may be filed up to thirty (30) days after the judgment becomes "not appealable" i.e., thirty (30) days after the sixty (60) day time for appeal has ended. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296, 113 S.Ct. 2625 (1993); 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d)(1)(B),(d)(2)(G).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
