HILL v. JOHNSON, 4:16-cv-04033. (2016)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20161005c33
Visitors: 14
Filed: Oct. 04, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 04, 2016
Summary: ORDER BARRY A. BRYANT , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Alexius M. Hill proceeds in this 42 U.S.C. 1983 matter pro se and in forma pauperis. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. ECF No. 18. On September 6, 2016 Plaintiff filed a Motion to Compel (ECF No. 18) asking the Court to enter an order compelling Defendant to respond to certain discovery requests. On September 19, 2016 Defendants filed a Response (ECF No. 21) in which they represented to the Court that Def
Summary: ORDER BARRY A. BRYANT , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Alexius M. Hill proceeds in this 42 U.S.C. 1983 matter pro se and in forma pauperis. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. ECF No. 18. On September 6, 2016 Plaintiff filed a Motion to Compel (ECF No. 18) asking the Court to enter an order compelling Defendant to respond to certain discovery requests. On September 19, 2016 Defendants filed a Response (ECF No. 21) in which they represented to the Court that Defe..
More
ORDER
BARRY A. BRYANT, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Alexius M. Hill proceeds in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 matter pro se and in forma pauperis. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. ECF No. 18.
On September 6, 2016 Plaintiff filed a Motion to Compel (ECF No. 18) asking the Court to enter an order compelling Defendant to respond to certain discovery requests. On September 19, 2016 Defendants filed a Response (ECF No. 21) in which they represented to the Court that Defendants had provided Plaintiff with responses to his requests.
Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (ECF No. 18) is DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
