Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SOLOMAN v. GRIFFIN, 4:16-cv-04054. (2017)

Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20170712968 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 11, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 11, 2017
Summary: ORDER BARRY A. BRYANT , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Clifton Orlando Soloman filed this 42 U.S.C. 1983 action pro se on June 29, 2016. ECF No. 1. Before the Court is Plaintiff's Response to Order to Show Cause in which he requests an extension of time to respond to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF No. 37. On April 14, 2017, Defendant Steven King filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF No. 25. On May 12, 2017, I entered an Order directing Plaintiff to file a Response to De
More

ORDER

Plaintiff Clifton Orlando Soloman filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action pro se on June 29, 2016. ECF No. 1. Before the Court is Plaintiff's Response to Order to Show Cause in which he requests an extension of time to respond to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF No. 37.

On April 14, 2017, Defendant Steven King filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF No. 25. On May 12, 2017, I entered an Order directing Plaintiff to file a Response to Defendant's motion on or before June 9, 2017. ECF No. 32. On May 3, 2017, Defendants Warden Brazell, Sheriff Ron Stovall and Corporal T. Hanning filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF No. 29. On May 17, 2017, I entered an order directing Plaintiff to file a Response to Defendants' motion on or before June 19, 2017. ECF No. 33.

On June 29, 2017, I entered an Order to Plaintiff to show cause as to why Plaintiff failed to file Responses to Defendants Motions for Summary Judgment. ECF No. 35. Plaintiff has responded to the Order to show cause and has requested an extension of time to respond to Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment. ECF No. 37.

I find good cause is shown for an extension, the request is not intended for the purpose of harassment or delay, and neither party will be prejudiced by the extension. Plaintiff's Motion for Extension (ECF No. 37) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is given an extension until August 11, 2017, to file a Response to Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment. Failure to respond within the required period of time may subject this matter to dismissal for failure to comply with a court order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer