USA v. Henry, 2:16-CR-20005. (2017)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20180102733
Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 29, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 29, 2017
Summary: ORDER P.K. HOLMES, III , Chief District Judge . The Court has received a report and recommendation (Doc. 39) from United States Magistrate Judge Mark E. Ford. Defendant has filed objections. The Magistrate recommends that the Court deny Defendant's motion to vacate. The Court has conducted de novo review of those portions of the report and recommendation to which Defendant has objected. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). The objections offer neither law nor fact requiring departure from the Magistrate
Summary: ORDER P.K. HOLMES, III , Chief District Judge . The Court has received a report and recommendation (Doc. 39) from United States Magistrate Judge Mark E. Ford. Defendant has filed objections. The Magistrate recommends that the Court deny Defendant's motion to vacate. The Court has conducted de novo review of those portions of the report and recommendation to which Defendant has objected. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). The objections offer neither law nor fact requiring departure from the Magistrate'..
More
ORDER
P.K. HOLMES, III, Chief District Judge.
The Court has received a report and recommendation (Doc. 39) from United States Magistrate Judge Mark E. Ford. Defendant has filed objections. The Magistrate recommends that the Court deny Defendant's motion to vacate. The Court has conducted de novo review of those portions of the report and recommendation to which Defendant has objected. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The objections offer neither law nor fact requiring departure from the Magistrate's findings. The report and recommendation is otherwise proper, contains no clear error, and is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's motion to vacate (Doc. 31) is DENIED and his petition is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. No certificate of appealability shall issue.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
