Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ford v. Wolcott, 4:18-cv-04153. (2019)

Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20190419g48 Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 18, 2019
Summary: ORDER BARRY A. BRYANT , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (ECF No. 52) and Defendants J.E. Bonding, Inc. and Dana Gentry's Motion to Take Deposition. (ECF No. 56). Defendants have filed a Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. (ECF No. 54). The Court has determined no response from Plaintiff is necessary to rule on the Motion to Take Deposition. On March 4, 2019, the Court entered an Initial Scheduling Order directing Defendants to provid
More

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (ECF No. 52) and Defendants J.E. Bonding, Inc. and Dana Gentry's Motion to Take Deposition. (ECF No. 56). Defendants have filed a Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. (ECF No. 54). The Court has determined no response from Plaintiff is necessary to rule on the Motion to Take Deposition.

On March 4, 2019, the Court entered an Initial Scheduling Order directing Defendants to provide Plaintiff with copies of incident reports and other documents referenced in Plaintiff's complaint, including photographs, and video footage by April 18, 2019. (ECF No. 47). The Order states that following these disclosures, the parties may engage in discovery. In their Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (ECF No. 54), Defendants represent they will provide Plaintiff with responses to his discovery requests within the time provided for in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and in accordance with the Court's scheduling order. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (ECF No. 52) is DENIED.

As for Defendants' motion to take Plaintiff's deposition, the Court's Initial Scheduling Order grants Defendants leave to take the deposition of Plaintiff pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(a)(2)(B). Accordingly, Defendants Motion to Depose Plaintiff (ECF No. 56) is GRANTED.

Defense counsel shall provide Plaintiff with notice of the date of the deposition in the form provided in Rule 30(b)(1) and such notice shall be deemed sufficient if the notice is mailed to Plaintiff at least fifteen (15) days prior to the scheduled date for the deposition. The failure of Plaintiff to attend, be sworn, and answer appropriate questions may result in sanctions, including dismissal of this lawsuit pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37.

Because Plaintiff is incarcerated, defense counsel shall send a copy of this order, the Court's Initial Scheduling Order (ECF No. 47), and the notice of deposition to the appropriate prison/jail official of the institution where Plaintiff is confined. This official shall allow Plaintiff to have his legal materials relating to this case in his possession during the deposition.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer