Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Howard v. King, 4:18-CV-04125. (2019)

Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20190509871 Visitors: 9
Filed: May 08, 2019
Latest Update: May 08, 2019
Summary: ORDER JAMES R. MARSCHEWSKI , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff proceeds in this Section 1983 matter pro se and in forma pauperis. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Defendants Adams, Walker, Runion, and Reynolds 1 as parties in this case. (ECF No. 40). Defendants do not object to the dismissal. (ECF Nos. 41, 42). Accordingly, the Clerk is DIRECTED to treat this as a stipulation of dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)
More

ORDER

Plaintiff proceeds in this Section 1983 matter pro se and in forma pauperis. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Defendants Adams, Walker, Runion, and Reynolds1 as parties in this case. (ECF No. 40). Defendants do not object to the dismissal. (ECF Nos. 41, 42).

Accordingly, the Clerk is DIRECTED to treat this as a stipulation of dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and DISMISS Defendants Adams, Walker, Runion, and Reynolds as parties in this case WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Defendant Reynolds was terminated as a Defendant in this case on April 2, 2019. (ECF No. 34). As Plaintiff filed an Objection (ECF No. 31) and then a Notice of Appeal (ECF No. 38) regarding that Recommendation and the Order adopting it, the Court will include Defendant Reynolds in this Order for dismissal.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer