United States v. Atkins, 1:14-cr-10011 (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20190813866
Visitors: 11
Filed: Aug. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 12, 2019
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY , District Judge . Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed June 10, 2019, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 211. Judge Bryant recommends that Movant Kenneth W. Atkins's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Pursuant to U.S.C. 2255 (ECF No. 200) be denied and that this case be dismissed with prejudice. No party has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation,
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY , District Judge . Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed June 10, 2019, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 211. Judge Bryant recommends that Movant Kenneth W. Atkins's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Pursuant to U.S.C. 2255 (ECF No. 200) be denied and that this case be dismissed with prejudice. No party has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, ..
More
ORDER
SUSAN O. HICKEY, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed June 10, 2019, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 211. Judge Bryant recommends that Movant Kenneth W. Atkins's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Pursuant to U.S.C. § 2255 (ECF No. 200) be denied and that this case be dismissed with prejudice. No party has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Upon review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in toto. Accordingly, Atkins's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Pursuant to U.S.C. § 2255 (ECF No. 200) is DENIED and this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Further, the Court finds that an appeal from dismissal would not be taken in good faith and no certificate of appealability should be issued.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
