Tucker v. Berryhill, 4:18-cv-04134. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20190820a51
Visitors: 7
Filed: Aug. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 19, 2019
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY , Chief District Judge . Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed August 2, 2019, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 13). On February 15, 2018, an Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") entered a decision denying Plaintiff's applications for Social Security disability benefits. On September 24, 2018, Plaintiff filed an appeal with this Court, challenging the ALJ's decision. Upon revi
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY , Chief District Judge . Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed August 2, 2019, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 13). On February 15, 2018, an Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") entered a decision denying Plaintiff's applications for Social Security disability benefits. On September 24, 2018, Plaintiff filed an appeal with this Court, challenging the ALJ's decision. Upon revie..
More
ORDER
SUSAN O. HICKEY, Chief District Judge.
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed August 2, 2019, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 13). On February 15, 2018, an Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") entered a decision denying Plaintiff's applications for Social Security disability benefits. On September 24, 2018, Plaintiff filed an appeal with this Court, challenging the ALJ's decision. Upon review, Judge Bryant has found that the ALJ's decision was not supported by substantial evidence. Consequently, Judge Bryant recommends that the ALJ's decision denying Plaintiff benefits be reversed and remanded.
Defendant has not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 13) in toto. Accordingly, the ALJ's decision denying Plaintiff benefits is REVERSED AND REMANDED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
