Boston v. Phantom Executive Protection, Inc., 6:19-cv-6029. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20190911a15
Visitors: 10
Filed: Sep. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 10, 2019
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY , Chief District Judge . Before the Court is Plaintiff Steve Boston's Motion to Dismiss Separate Defendants Joseph Bernard Major and Phantom Executive Protection, Inc. (ECF No. 18). The Court finds that no response is necessary and that the matter is ripe for consideration. Plaintiff states that he has failed to timely serve Separate Defendants Major and Phantom within the time required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Therefore, Plaintiff concedes that dismi
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY , Chief District Judge . Before the Court is Plaintiff Steve Boston's Motion to Dismiss Separate Defendants Joseph Bernard Major and Phantom Executive Protection, Inc. (ECF No. 18). The Court finds that no response is necessary and that the matter is ripe for consideration. Plaintiff states that he has failed to timely serve Separate Defendants Major and Phantom within the time required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Therefore, Plaintiff concedes that dismis..
More
ORDER
SUSAN O. HICKEY, Chief District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiff Steve Boston's Motion to Dismiss Separate Defendants Joseph Bernard Major and Phantom Executive Protection, Inc. (ECF No. 18). The Court finds that no response is necessary and that the matter is ripe for consideration.
Plaintiff states that he has failed to timely serve Separate Defendants Major and Phantom within the time required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Therefore, Plaintiff concedes that dismissal of those defendants without prejudice is appropriate and asks the Court to so rule.
Upon consideration, the Court finds that good cause for the motion has been shown. Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate completed service on Separate Defendants Major and Phantom and the ninety-day period for him to do so has passed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion (ECF No. 18) is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims against Separate Defendants Joseph Bernard Major and Phantom Executive Protection, Inc. are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
