Goodson v. Saul, 6:18-cv-06122. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20191120970
Visitors: 19
Filed: Nov. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 19, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT ROBERT T. DAWSON , Senior District Judge . The Court has received a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 22) from United States Magistrate Judge Barry A. Bryant. Plaintiff brings suit pursuant to 205(g) of Title II of the Social Security Act ("the Act"), 42 U.S.C. 405(g) (2010), seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (SSA) denying her applications for Supplemental Security Income (SSI), disability Insurance Benefits (D
Summary: JUDGMENT ROBERT T. DAWSON , Senior District Judge . The Court has received a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 22) from United States Magistrate Judge Barry A. Bryant. Plaintiff brings suit pursuant to 205(g) of Title II of the Social Security Act ("the Act"), 42 U.S.C. 405(g) (2010), seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (SSA) denying her applications for Supplemental Security Income (SSI), disability Insurance Benefits (DI..
More
JUDGMENT
ROBERT T. DAWSON, Senior District Judge.
The Court has received a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 22) from United States Magistrate Judge Barry A. Bryant. Plaintiff brings suit pursuant to §205(g) of Title II of the Social Security Act ("the Act"), 42 U.S.C. §405(g) (2010), seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (SSA) denying her applications for Supplemental Security Income (SSI), disability Insurance Benefits (DIB), and a period of disability under Title II and XVI of the Act. Upon review, the Magistrate recommended that Plaintiff's case be reversed and remanded. Fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties. The matter is now ripe for consideration.
The Court has reviewed this case, and being well and sufficiently advised, finds that the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation; reverses the decision of the Commissioner; and remands this case to the Commissioner for further consideration pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g).
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
