Tillman v. Midland Credit Management, Inc., 4:19-cv-4030. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20191127b59
Visitors: 4
Filed: Nov. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 26, 2019
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY , Chief District Judge . Before the Court is Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. (ECF No. 27). The Court finds that no response is necessary and that the matter is ripe for consideration. On July 5, 2019, Defendants filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings. In the instant motion, the parties ask the Court to stay the deadlines set out in the Court's Initial Scheduling Order, pending the Court's ruling on the motion for judgment on the pleadings.
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY , Chief District Judge . Before the Court is Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. (ECF No. 27). The Court finds that no response is necessary and that the matter is ripe for consideration. On July 5, 2019, Defendants filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings. In the instant motion, the parties ask the Court to stay the deadlines set out in the Court's Initial Scheduling Order, pending the Court's ruling on the motion for judgment on the pleadings. U..
More
ORDER
SUSAN O. HICKEY, Chief District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. (ECF No. 27). The Court finds that no response is necessary and that the matter is ripe for consideration.
On July 5, 2019, Defendants filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings. In the instant motion, the parties ask the Court to stay the deadlines set out in the Court's Initial Scheduling Order, pending the Court's ruling on the motion for judgment on the pleadings.
Upon consideration, the Court finds that good cause for the motion has been shown. Accordingly, the parties' motion (ECF No. 27) is hereby GRANTED. The deadlines set out in the Court's Initial Scheduling Order (ECF No. 26) are stayed until the Court rules on Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
