Johnston v. City of Fort Smith, 2:18-CV-2152. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20191227673
Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 26, 2019
Summary: ORDER P.K. HOLMES, III , District Judge . Before the Court is Defendant City of Fort Smith, Arkansas's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 30), statement of facts (Doc. 31), and brief in support (Doc. 32). Plaintiff Mary Johnston filed a response (Doc. 38) and statement of facts (Doc. 39) to which Defendant filed a reply (Doc. 41). The Court has reviewed the briefs and supporting documents. Viewing the record in the light most favorable to Plaintiff, the Court finds questions of law and mate
Summary: ORDER P.K. HOLMES, III , District Judge . Before the Court is Defendant City of Fort Smith, Arkansas's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 30), statement of facts (Doc. 31), and brief in support (Doc. 32). Plaintiff Mary Johnston filed a response (Doc. 38) and statement of facts (Doc. 39) to which Defendant filed a reply (Doc. 41). The Court has reviewed the briefs and supporting documents. Viewing the record in the light most favorable to Plaintiff, the Court finds questions of law and mater..
More
ORDER
P.K. HOLMES, III, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant City of Fort Smith, Arkansas's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 30), statement of facts (Doc. 31), and brief in support (Doc. 32). Plaintiff Mary Johnston filed a response (Doc. 38) and statement of facts (Doc. 39) to which Defendant filed a reply (Doc. 41). The Court has reviewed the briefs and supporting documents. Viewing the record in the light most favorable to Plaintiff, the Court finds questions of law and material fact remain with respect to Plaintiff's claims.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's motion (Doc. 30) for summary judgment is DENIED, and the matter remains pending for trial.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
