Filed: Jan. 07, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 07, 2020
Summary: ORDER BARRY A. BRYANT , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Sorrell Holdings, LLC ("Sorrell") has filed a Motion to Lift Stay and For Entry of Proposed Scheduling Order. ECF No. 78. Defendant, Infinity Headwear & Apparel, LLC ("Infinity"), has responded. ECF No. 80. The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge to conduct any and all proceedings in this case, including conducting the trial, ordering the entry of a final judgment, and conducting all post-judgme
Summary: ORDER BARRY A. BRYANT , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Sorrell Holdings, LLC ("Sorrell") has filed a Motion to Lift Stay and For Entry of Proposed Scheduling Order. ECF No. 78. Defendant, Infinity Headwear & Apparel, LLC ("Infinity"), has responded. ECF No. 80. The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge to conduct any and all proceedings in this case, including conducting the trial, ordering the entry of a final judgment, and conducting all post-judgmen..
More
ORDER
BARRY A. BRYANT, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Sorrell Holdings, LLC ("Sorrell") has filed a Motion to Lift Stay and For Entry of Proposed Scheduling Order. ECF No. 78. Defendant, Infinity Headwear & Apparel, LLC ("Infinity"), has responded. ECF No. 80. The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge to conduct any and all proceedings in this case, including conducting the trial, ordering the entry of a final judgment, and conducting all post-judgment proceedings. ECF No. 33. After considering this Motion, the Court finds it should be GRANTED IN PART.
On January 3, 2019, the Court issued a stay of this case pending the ex parte reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,887,007 (the "patent-in-suit") by the United States Patent and Trademark Office until further order of the Court. ECF No. 68. On or about April 22, 2019, the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued a Notice of Intent to Issue Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate. ECF No. 69. In light of this, the stay of this case should and hereby is LIFTED.
The Court will separately issue a new Final Scheduling Order, setting a new trial date and new pretrial deadlines.
