Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

FORT v. KANE, CV 11-2385-PHX-GMS (MEA). (2012)

Court: District Court, D. Arizona Number: infdco20120111642 Visitors: 19
Filed: Jan. 10, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 10, 2012
Summary: ORDER G. MURRAY SNOW, District Judge. Petitioner has filed a Motion to Dismiss Petition Without Prejudice (Doc 13). No answer or motion for summary judgment has been filed by Respondents. Petitioner's Motion is treated as a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Wilson v. City of San Jose , 111 F.3d 688 , 692 (9th Cir. 1997) ("a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his action prior to service by the defenda
More

ORDER

G. MURRAY SNOW, District Judge.

Petitioner has filed a Motion to Dismiss Petition Without Prejudice (Doc 13). No answer or motion for summary judgment has been filed by Respondents. Petitioner's Motion is treated as a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997) ("a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his action prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary judgment").

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 13) is treated as a notice of voluntary dismissal and this action is dismissed without prejudice.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer