U.S. v. AVILA, CR 11-126-1-PHX-JAT (LOA). (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Arizona
Number: infdco20120410634
Visitors: 16
Filed: Apr. 09, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 09, 2012
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE O. ANDERSON, Magistrate Judge. A pretrial revocation hearing was held on April 5, 2012 on the petition on violation of release conditions. The Court finds that Defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waives his right to a revocation hearing pursuant to Title 18, U.S.C. 3148. The Court further finds that by clear and convincing evidence that Defendant has violated the terms and conditions of his release by failing to abide by the program rules at Recovery Homes, I
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE O. ANDERSON, Magistrate Judge. A pretrial revocation hearing was held on April 5, 2012 on the petition on violation of release conditions. The Court finds that Defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waives his right to a revocation hearing pursuant to Title 18, U.S.C. 3148. The Court further finds that by clear and convincing evidence that Defendant has violated the terms and conditions of his release by failing to abide by the program rules at Recovery Homes, In..
More
ORDER
LAWRENCE O. ANDERSON, Magistrate Judge.
A pretrial revocation hearing was held on April 5, 2012 on the petition on violation of release conditions.
The Court finds that Defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waives his right to a revocation hearing pursuant to Title 18, U.S.C. § 3148.
The Court further finds that by clear and convincing evidence that Defendant has violated the terms and conditions of his release by failing to abide by the program rules at Recovery Homes, Inc.
The Court further finds that it is unlikely that the Defendant would abide by all conditions of release because he has continued to use illicit drugs while on release, he has been given several opportunities to address his significant substance abuse issues, and he continues to violate his release conditions.
IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant shall be detained as a serious flight risk and a danger to the community until further order of the assigned District Judge.
Source: Leagle
