U.S. v. VASQUEZ-CORRALES, CR 11-2342-TUC-DCB(JJM). (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Arizona
Number: infdco20120504703
Visitors: 3
Filed: Apr. 30, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 30, 2012
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. BURY, District Judge. This matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and the local rules of practice of this Court for hearing and report and recommendation on the Defendant's Motion to Suppress Statements. Magistrate Judge Marshall conducted a hearing on April 3, 2012, and issued her Report and Recommendation on April 5, 2012. A copy was sent to all parties. No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ha
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. BURY, District Judge. This matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and the local rules of practice of this Court for hearing and report and recommendation on the Defendant's Motion to Suppress Statements. Magistrate Judge Marshall conducted a hearing on April 3, 2012, and issued her Report and Recommendation on April 5, 2012. A copy was sent to all parties. No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation hav..
More
ORDER
DAVID C. BURY, District Judge.
This matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and the local rules of practice of this Court for hearing and report and recommendation on the Defendant's Motion to Suppress Statements.
Magistrate Judge Marshall conducted a hearing on April 3, 2012, and issued her Report and Recommendation on April 5, 2012. A copy was sent to all parties. No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.1 Any objections that have not been raised are waived and will not be addressed by the Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).
The Court, having made an independent review of the record, orders as follows:
IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Marshall's Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED by this Court as the findings of fact and conclusions of law.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendant's Motion to Suppress Statements is granted.
FootNotes
1. The Court notes the government reserves the right to use statements made to Agent Steinkuller to complete the I-826 as impeachment evidence.
Source: Leagle
