Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

PATTERSON v. GRANT, CV 10-2364-PHX-PGR (SPL). (2012)

Court: District Court, D. Arizona Number: infdco20120628830 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 27, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 27, 2012
Summary: ORDER PAUL G. ROSENBLATT, District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiff's "Motion for Delay," in which Plaintiff seeks a stay of this action because he "stopped eating or drinking anything" to protest his confinement in lockdown. (Doc. 27.) Since the filing of the motion, however, Plaintiff has demonstrated an ability to continue to participate in this and other actions. ( See Docs. 32, 33; case No. 10-cv-1571-PGR-SPL; 05-cv-1159-PGR-SPL). His motion for a stay is therefore denied. According
More

ORDER

PAUL G. ROSENBLATT, District Judge.

Before the Court is Plaintiff's "Motion for Delay," in which Plaintiff seeks a stay of this action because he "stopped eating or drinking anything" to protest his confinement in lockdown. (Doc. 27.) Since the filing of the motion, however, Plaintiff has demonstrated an ability to continue to participate in this and other actions. (See Docs. 32, 33; case No. 10-cv-1571-PGR-SPL; 05-cv-1159-PGR-SPL). His motion for a stay is therefore denied.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

(1) The reference to the Magistrate Judge is withdrawn as to Plaintiff's Motion for Delay (Doc. 27).

(2) Plaintiff's Motion for Delay (Doc. 27) is denied.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer