WHITE v. LINDERMEN, CV-11-08152-PCT-RCB. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Arizona
Number: infdco20140331945
Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 28, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2014
Summary: ORDER ROBERT C. BROOMFIELD, Senior District Judge. Currently pending before the court is the plaintiff pro se Demetrius M. White's Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (Doc. 80). The court denies his motion as moot because, as more fully set forth in the Defendants' Sealed Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (Doc. 82), the defendants have fully complied with the terms of the Settlement Agreement. And, indeed, on February 13, 2014, the plaintiff advised Assistant
Summary: ORDER ROBERT C. BROOMFIELD, Senior District Judge. Currently pending before the court is the plaintiff pro se Demetrius M. White's Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (Doc. 80). The court denies his motion as moot because, as more fully set forth in the Defendants' Sealed Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (Doc. 82), the defendants have fully complied with the terms of the Settlement Agreement. And, indeed, on February 13, 2014, the plaintiff advised Assistant A..
More
ORDER
ROBERT C. BROOMFIELD, Senior District Judge.
Currently pending before the court is the plaintiff pro se Demetrius M. White's Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (Doc. 80). The court denies his motion as moot because, as more fully set forth in the Defendants' Sealed Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (Doc. 82), the defendants have fully complied with the terms of the Settlement Agreement. And, indeed, on February 13, 2014, the plaintiff advised Assistant Arizona Attorney General Kelley J. Morrissey that he would be withdrawing this motion, but to date he has not. Resp. (Doc. 82), exh. A thereto (Doc. 82-1) at 3:23-24, ¶ 7.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
(1) the plaintiff's "Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement" (Doc. 80) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
