Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CANO-MENDOZA v. U.S., CV-13-01442-PHX-SRB. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Arizona Number: infdco20140421525 Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 18, 2014
Summary: ORDER SUSAN R. BOLTON, District Judge. Petitioner filed his Petition for Error Coram Nobis on July 15, 2013 arguing that the Court should find fundamental error occurred in his 1995 criminal matter, in which he pled guilty to entering the United States without inspection. Respondent filed its Response to Petitioner's Petition for Error Coram Nobis on November 5, 2013. No reply was filed. On March 26, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued her Report and Recommendation recommending that the peti
More

ORDER

SUSAN R. BOLTON, District Judge.

Petitioner filed his Petition for Error Coram Nobis on July 15, 2013 arguing that the Court should find fundamental error occurred in his 1995 criminal matter, in which he pled guilty to entering the United States without inspection. Respondent filed its Response to Petitioner's Petition for Error Coram Nobis on November 5, 2013. No reply was filed. On March 26, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued her Report and Recommendation recommending that the petition be denied.

In her Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had 14 days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation within which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time to file such objections has expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.

The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as the order of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis Habeas Corpus is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying any Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer