Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. BRAVO-CUEVAS, CV-12-02043-PHX-SRB (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Arizona Number: infdco20140624767 Visitors: 17
Filed: Jun. 23, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 23, 2014
Summary: ORDER SUSAN R. BOLTON, District Judge. Movant, David Casimiro Bravo-Cuevas, filed a Second Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 on July 1, 2014. The United States filed its response in opposition on February 11, 2014. Movant did not file a reply. The Magistrate Judge filed his Report and Recommendation on May 2, 2014 recommending that Movant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence be denied. In his Report and Recommendation the Magis
More

ORDER

SUSAN R. BOLTON, District Judge.

Movant, David Casimiro Bravo-Cuevas, filed a Second Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on July 1, 2014. The United States filed its response in opposition on February 11, 2014. Movant did not file a reply.

The Magistrate Judge filed his Report and Recommendation on May 2, 2014 recommending that Movant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence be denied. In his Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had 14 days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation within which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time to file such objections has expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.

The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as the Order of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Movant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied because Movant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer