Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY v. LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, CV-11-1954-PHX-SMM. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Arizona Number: infdco20140625h24 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 25, 2014
Summary: ORDER STEPHEN M. McNAMEE, Senior District Judge. Before the Court is a Stipulation of Dismissal between American Safety Indemnity Company ("ASIC"); and Lexington Insurance Company, American Home Assurance Company, and Commerce and Industry Insurance Company (collectively "AIG"). (Doc. 371.) To be effective at this stage of the proceedings, a stipulated dismissal must be "signed by all parties who have appeared." Fed R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). There is non-binding authority to suggest that a
More

ORDER

STEPHEN M. McNAMEE, Senior District Judge.

Before the Court is a Stipulation of Dismissal between American Safety Indemnity Company ("ASIC"); and Lexington Insurance Company, American Home Assurance Company, and Commerce and Industry Insurance Company (collectively "AIG"). (Doc. 371.)

To be effective at this stage of the proceedings, a stipulated dismissal must be "signed by all parties who have appeared." Fed R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). There is non-binding authority to suggest that a stipulation signed by a plaintiff and some but not all defendants can be effective against those defendants who signed the stipulation. E.g., McNamara v. Edwards, 1993 WL 410689, 8 F.3d 28 (9th Cir. Oct. 15, 1993) (unpublished table decision). Alternatively, the Court may dismiss an action upon plaintiff's request on terms the court considers proper. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). Thus, the Court may consider a defective Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) dismissal signed by plaintiff pursuant to subsection (a)(2) of that Rule. Rule 41 "applies to a dismissal of any counterclaim, crossclaim, or third-party claim." Id. 41(c).

ASIC is one of 11 Counter/Cross-Defendants to AIG's counter/cross-claims. (Docs. 153; 154; 155.) Some of AIG's Cross-Defendants have their own crossclaims against ASIC. (Docs. 120; 132; 214.) However, the only parties that signed the instant stipulation are AIG and ASIC (Doc. 371); therefore, the stipulation is not signed by all the parties to the action, nor is it signed by all the parties to AIG's crossclaim against ASIC. Notwithstanding the tangled and overlapping nature of the parties' claims, the instant stipulation is narrowly limited to dismissal of ASIC from just AIG's crossclaims, and not the crossclaims of other Cross-Claimants/Cross-Defendants. Under these terms, the Court considers dismissal of ASIC from all of AIG's crossclaims—and only AIG's crossclaims—to be proper.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED dismissing without prejudice ASIC from AIG's crossclaims.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer