FERRELL v. RYAN, CV-13-0305-TUC-DCB. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Arizona
Number: infdco20140924d05
Visitors: 23
Filed: Sep. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 22, 2014
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. BURY, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Bowman issued her Report and Recommendation on July 22, 2014, recommending that the District Court DENY the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and dismiss the action with prejudice. A copy was sent to all parties and Petitioner was granted an extension of time to file objections. No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been timely filed. Consequently, any objections that have not been raised are waived and wil
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. BURY, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Bowman issued her Report and Recommendation on July 22, 2014, recommending that the District Court DENY the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and dismiss the action with prejudice. A copy was sent to all parties and Petitioner was granted an extension of time to file objections. No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been timely filed. Consequently, any objections that have not been raised are waived and will..
More
ORDER
DAVID C. BURY, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Bowman issued her Report and Recommendation on July 22, 2014, recommending that the District Court DENY the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and dismiss the action with prejudice. A copy was sent to all parties and Petitioner was granted an extension of time to file objections. No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been timely filed. Consequently, any objections that have not been raised are waived and will not be addressed by the Court.
The Court, having made an independent review of the record, orders as follows:
IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Bowman's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 29) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED by this Court as the findings of fact and conclusions of law.
IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED and this action is dismissed with prejudice. A Final Judgment shall enter separately.
Source: Leagle
