U.S. v. MORALES, CR-14-0680-PHX-SRB. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Arizona
Number: infdco20141010638
Visitors: 20
Filed: Oct. 09, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 09, 2014
Summary: ORDER DAVID K. DUNCAN, Magistrate Judge. Upon Defendant's Motion to Modify Conditions of Release (Third Request) (Doc. 27), having no opposition by the U.S. Attorney and Pretrial Services, and good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED modifying Phillip Robert Morales' conditions of release permitting Mr. Morales to attend a Visitation hearing which is scheduled for Monday, October 13, 2014 at 11:30 a.m., on the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Reservation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other con
Summary: ORDER DAVID K. DUNCAN, Magistrate Judge. Upon Defendant's Motion to Modify Conditions of Release (Third Request) (Doc. 27), having no opposition by the U.S. Attorney and Pretrial Services, and good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED modifying Phillip Robert Morales' conditions of release permitting Mr. Morales to attend a Visitation hearing which is scheduled for Monday, October 13, 2014 at 11:30 a.m., on the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Reservation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other cond..
More
ORDER
DAVID K. DUNCAN, Magistrate Judge.
Upon Defendant's Motion to Modify Conditions of Release (Third Request) (Doc. 27), having no opposition by the U.S. Attorney and Pretrial Services, and good cause appearing,
IT IS ORDERED modifying Phillip Robert Morales' conditions of release permitting Mr. Morales to attend a Visitation hearing which is scheduled for Monday, October 13, 2014 at 11:30 a.m., on the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Reservation.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other conditions of release imposed on the defendant will remain the same unless otherwise ordered by this Court.
The Court finds excludable delay under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h) _____ from _____to _____.
Source: Leagle
