RAMOS v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CV-13-00887-PHX-ROS. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Arizona
Number: infdco20141017737
Visitors: 17
Filed: Oct. 16, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 16, 2014
Summary: ORDER ROSLYN O. SILVER, Senior District Judge. Before the Court is a report and recommendation from the Magistrate Judge, (Doc. 21), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. No objection to the report and recommendation was filed and the time for doing so has expired. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). The court accepts the recommended decision of the United States Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Rule 4(m), Defendant Rodriguez is DISMIS
Summary: ORDER ROSLYN O. SILVER, Senior District Judge. Before the Court is a report and recommendation from the Magistrate Judge, (Doc. 21), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. No objection to the report and recommendation was filed and the time for doing so has expired. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). The court accepts the recommended decision of the United States Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Rule 4(m), Defendant Rodriguez is DISMISS..
More
ORDER
ROSLYN O. SILVER, Senior District Judge.
Before the Court is a report and recommendation from the Magistrate Judge, (Doc. 21), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. No objection to the report and recommendation was filed and the time for doing so has expired. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2).
The court accepts the recommended decision of the United States Magistrate Judge.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Rule 4(m), Defendant Rodriguez is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Source: Leagle
