BUTLER v. CLAY, CV-12-801-TUC-DCB. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Arizona
Number: infdco20150205766
Visitors: 20
Filed: Feb. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 02, 2015
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. BURY, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Rateau issued her Report and Recommendation on November 19, 2014, recommending that the District Court deny the Petitioner's Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and dismiss the action with prejudice. A copy was sent to all parties, notifying all parties that written objections must be filed within fourteen days of service. 28 U.S.C. 636(b). No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed. Consequent
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. BURY, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Rateau issued her Report and Recommendation on November 19, 2014, recommending that the District Court deny the Petitioner's Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and dismiss the action with prejudice. A copy was sent to all parties, notifying all parties that written objections must be filed within fourteen days of service. 28 U.S.C. 636(b). No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed. Consequentl..
More
ORDER
DAVID C. BURY, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Rateau issued her Report and Recommendation on November 19, 2014, recommending that the District Court deny the Petitioner's Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and dismiss the action with prejudice. A copy was sent to all parties, notifying all parties that written objections must be filed within fourteen days of service. 28 U.S.C. §636(b). No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed. Consequently, any objections that have not been raised are waived and will not be addressed by the Court.
The Court, having made an independent review of the record, orders as follows:
IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Rateau's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 21) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED by this Court as the findings of fact and conclusions of law.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 6) is DENIED and this action is dismissed with prejudice. A Final Judgment shall enter separately. `
Source: Leagle
