Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. ROBLEDO-BARRIOS, CR-12-01563-PHX-SRB (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Arizona Number: infdco20150407781 Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 06, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2015
Summary: ORDER SUSAN R. BOLTON , District Judge . Movant, Eugenio Robledo-Barrios, filed a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 on July 14, 2014. The United States filed its response in opposition on February 4, 2015. Movant did not file a reply. The Magistrate Judge filed the Report and Recommendation on March 16, 2015 recommending that Movant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence be denied. In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judg
More

ORDER

Movant, Eugenio Robledo-Barrios, filed a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on July 14, 2014. The United States filed its response in opposition on February 4, 2015. Movant did not file a reply.

The Magistrate Judge filed the Report and Recommendation on March 16, 2015 recommending that Movant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence be denied. In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation within which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time to file such objections has expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.

The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as the Order of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying Movant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. The dismissal of the Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable and because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer