Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ROSCIANO v. EXPERIAN, CV-14-02102-PHX-NVW. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Arizona Number: infdco20150504a10 Visitors: 7
Filed: May 01, 2015
Latest Update: May 01, 2015
Summary: ORDER NEIL V. WAKE , District Judge . Before the court are Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate Order of Dismissal, etc. (Doc. 52), the Response (Doc. 53), and the Reply (Doc. 54). In the court's discretion, late commencement of the arbitration will be allowed. The court also concludes, upon reconsideration of its April 1, 2015 order (Doc. 50), that Plaintiff's failure to comply with the prior orders compelling arbitration (Doc. 37, 49) does not warrant dismissal with prejudice. Those orders requir
More

ORDER

Before the court are Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate Order of Dismissal, etc. (Doc. 52), the Response (Doc. 53), and the Reply (Doc. 54). In the court's discretion, late commencement of the arbitration will be allowed. The court also concludes, upon reconsideration of its April 1, 2015 order (Doc. 50), that Plaintiff's failure to comply with the prior orders compelling arbitration (Doc. 37, 49) does not warrant dismissal with prejudice. Those orders require arbitration only of Plaintiff's claims against Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc.; they do not subject to arbitration any other party against whom this case has already been dismissed.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate Order of Dismissal, etc., (Doc. 52) is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the order of April 1, 2015 (Doc. 50), is vacated.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer