Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

WEISKOPF v. COLVIN, CIV 13-1979-PHX-MHB. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Arizona Number: infdco20150608c05 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 04, 2015
Summary: ORDER MICHELLE H. BURNS , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Doc. 37). Rule 24(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure requires a party seeking to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal to file a motion in district court, attaching an affidavit that: "(A) shows in the detail prescribed by Form 4 of the Appendix of Forms the party's inability to pay or to give security for fees and costs; (B) claims a
More

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Doc. 37). Rule 24(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure requires a party seeking to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal to file a motion in district court, attaching an affidavit that: "(A) shows in the detail prescribed by Form 4 of the Appendix of Forms the party's inability to pay or to give security for fees and costs; (B) claims an entitlement to redress; and (C) states the issues that the party intends to present on appeal." Plaintiff has complied with these requirements. The Court finds that Plaintiff has made sufficient showing that she cannot pay the fees and costs associated with her appeal.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED granting Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Doc. 37).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer