U.S. v. MEDINA, CR 11-1901-TUC-DCB(BPV). (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Arizona
Number: infdco20150911646
Filed: Sep. 08, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 08, 2015
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. BURY , District Judge . This matter came before the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and local rules of practice of this Court for hearing and report and recommendation at the time of defendant's Admit/Deny Hearing on his Petition to Revoke Supervised Release scheduled before Magistrate Judge Bernardo P. Velasco on September 1, 2015. Counsel reached a stipulation and Judge Velasco issued his Report and Recommendation on September 2, 2015 noti
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. BURY , District Judge . This matter came before the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and local rules of practice of this Court for hearing and report and recommendation at the time of defendant's Admit/Deny Hearing on his Petition to Revoke Supervised Release scheduled before Magistrate Judge Bernardo P. Velasco on September 1, 2015. Counsel reached a stipulation and Judge Velasco issued his Report and Recommendation on September 2, 2015 notin..
More
ORDER
DAVID C. BURY, District Judge.
This matter came before the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and local rules of practice of this Court for hearing and report and recommendation at the time of defendant's Admit/Deny Hearing on his Petition to Revoke Supervised Release scheduled before Magistrate Judge Bernardo P. Velasco on September 1, 2015. Counsel reached a stipulation and Judge Velasco issued his Report and Recommendation on September 2, 2015 noting all parties waived the period of time for filing objection. Accordingly, after this Court's review and consideration of the record,
IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Velasco's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 39) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED by this Court as the findings of fact and conclusions of law.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED modifying Special Condition #2 of the Defendant's Conditions of Supervised Release to include all cell phones, thumb drives, or other electronic storage media possessed by Defendant.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Petition to Revoke Supervised Release (Doc. 26) is hereby dismissed.
Source: Leagle
