Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

HARRIS v. ARPAIO, CV14-2158 PHX DGC. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Arizona Number: infdco20151021630 Visitors: 12
Filed: Oct. 20, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 20, 2015
Summary: ORDER DAVID G. CAMPBELL , District Judge . Plaintiff Matthew Linden Harris has filed a prisoner civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Doc. 1. United States Magistrate Judge Bridget S. Bade has issued a report and recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with Court orders pursuant to Rule 41(b). Doc. 47. No objection has been filed, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b
More

ORDER

Plaintiff Matthew Linden Harris has filed a prisoner civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. 1. United States Magistrate Judge Bridget S. Bade has issued a report and recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with Court orders pursuant to Rule 41(b). Doc. 47. No objection has been filed, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). The Court will accept the R&R and dismiss this action without prejudice.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The R&R (Doc. 47) is accepted. 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. 3. A certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied. 4. The Clerk is directed to terminate this action.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer