McNAIR v. MAXWELL & MORGAN PC, CV-14-00869-PHX-DGC. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Arizona
Number: infdco20151105a48
Visitors: 8
Filed: Nov. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 04, 2015
Summary: ORDER DAVID G. CAMPBELL , District Judge . The Court ruled on Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. 80) and Defendants' cross motion for summary judgment (Doc. 100) on September 22, 2015. Doc. 124. Both parties subsequently moved for reconsideration of section III(B)(2)(a) of the Court's September 22, 2015 order. Docs. 126, 130. The issues are fully briefed. The Court will grant both parties' motions and issue an amended order. 1 IT IS ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff's (Doc. 130)
Summary: ORDER DAVID G. CAMPBELL , District Judge . The Court ruled on Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. 80) and Defendants' cross motion for summary judgment (Doc. 100) on September 22, 2015. Doc. 124. Both parties subsequently moved for reconsideration of section III(B)(2)(a) of the Court's September 22, 2015 order. Docs. 126, 130. The issues are fully briefed. The Court will grant both parties' motions and issue an amended order. 1 IT IS ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff's (Doc. 130) a..
More
ORDER
DAVID G. CAMPBELL, District Judge.
The Court ruled on Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. 80) and Defendants' cross motion for summary judgment (Doc. 100) on September 22, 2015. Doc. 124. Both parties subsequently moved for reconsideration of section III(B)(2)(a) of the Court's September 22, 2015 order. Docs. 126, 130. The issues are fully briefed. The Court will grant both parties' motions and issue an amended order.1
IT IS ORDERED:
1. Plaintiff's (Doc. 130) and Defendants' (Doc. 126) motions for reconsideration are granted.
2. The Court will issue a separate amended order ruling on Plaintiff's partial motion for summary judgment (Doc. 80) and Defendants' cross motion for summary judgment (Doc. 100).
FootNotes
1. Both parties' requests for oral argument are denied because the issues have been fully briefed and oral argument will not aid the Court's decision. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); Partridge v. Reich, 141 F.3d 920, 926 (9th Cir. 1998).
Source: Leagle
